Designing a Health Research Project

Question: Explain designing a health research project. Answer: The evaluation plan has been designed for maternal education. 1. Steps undertaken in planning the proposed evaluation For the success of this evaluation program, fortnightly coordination, as well as re-supply meetings, has to be carried out with the objective of problem solving, sharing of information and rotations through the maternity unit (Sutcuoglu et al., 2012). The preparation for the evaluation of this module will comprise of several steps. The initial step of the evaluation includes the context along with the background of the part to be assessed. This augments the understanding of what is to be evaluated by the individuals who will be involved in the process of evaluation. The second step is concerned with the establishment of the objectives of the evaluation, such as the complete course of the process of evaluation will be lined up with meeting the objectives of the evaluation (Posavac, 2015). The third step of the evaluation extends over the methods and designs which are to be employed in the collection of essential data for the process of evaluation. This includes factors such as collection of data, sampling, significance testing and analysis of data (Grembowski, 2015). The fourth step includes the selection of the background in which the process of evaluation will take place. The fifth step is involved with the selection of participants to be used in the process of evaluation; the number of participants in this evaluation will be 55. The seventh step includes the inferring of findings and results which will be arrived during the process of evaluation (Grembowski, 2015). 2. Evaluation research question The research question which is to be focused on this evaluation is, whether the fortnightly coordination, as well as re-supply meetings occurring in this, is making sure the sharing of information, solving problems and rotations through the maternity unit. The aim of this program of evaluation is to reveal the efficiency of the re-supply meetings and fortnightly coordination held in the slum areas of Kathmandu in assuring the recognition of the objective of sharing information among the pregnant women, helping them in solving problems associated with maternity. Diverse reasons are provided for this purpose. The first reason for the program of evaluation includes the fact that the NGO requires expediency, cost reduction and rapidity. This can be attained through the carrying out meetings with several women along with their families and share information which will enhance the reduction of the rate of morbidity and mortality in the slum areas of Kathmandu (Nepal) (Donaldson, 2012). Fundamentally the efficiency of the meetings with the respondents needs to be evaluated in order to discover the actual state of the program. The second reason for the evaluation is to make certain that this program provides a foundation for sharing of essential information among the women and their families so that the accurate result are arrived at with respect to the enhance the rate of solving problems associated with maternity (Royse et al., 2015). This works in the direction of attaining necessary information regarding the assessments that were carried out during the initial establishment of the NGO in the previous year, equipped every member of the staff with the required proficiency for working in any section of the maternity unit (Munoz, 2013). The fourth reason encompasses the information that places the objectives of the program of evaluation have to be met subsequent to its initiation, such that the majority of the women who were not able to completely make use of the services that are provided by this program along with the assessment of the services provided to the pregnant women. This requires an evaluation of the meetings with the women and their families that has been carried out over the previous year, as they should outline the basis for accomplishing the set objectives for the entire program of evaluation (Whittaker et al., 2012). Research Methodology The most relevant research methodology to be employed in the process of evaluation encompasses steps such as informed consent, recruitment, and sampling along with the collection of data and analysis of data. The process of evaluation will include coordination and meetings with the respondents for introducing the idea of evaluation to the staff of the program (ÄÂ ±nar et al., 2016). This will assist in the selection of suitable participants which will be utilized in the process of sampling. The process of recruitment will include those participants who are familiar with the maternity unit if this program such that the team which is intended for evaluation can visit the relevant areas allocated to them. After the process of recruitment, the evaluation team will get informed consent from the members recruited in the course of evaluation (Cousins et al., 2014). For this evaluation quantitative as well as qualitative methods will be utilized. The quantitative analysis will be performed by carrying out a survey of a large number of respondents. The survey will be carried out with the help of a questionnaire. On the other hand qualitative method is concerned with the enhancement of the products and services. Therefore, both these methods are appropriate for this evaluation (Boulmetis Dutwin 2014). The entire participants will be given an alternative of not participating in the process of evaluation. The collection of data will comprise of the drafting of a setting questionnaire in English and after that, it is translated in the local language which is utilized in the slum areas of Kathmandu. In that questionnaire, there will be questions related to the maternal care, the information type shared in the meetings, the problems which they have faced or are facing, the most efficient methods solving the problems and the advantages of birth at hospital vs. birth at home. The questions that will be provided are to be partly structured such that diverse answers will be obtained from the respondents (Sutcuoglu et al., 2012). The questionnaire will also encompass questions like how the NGO is performing in enhancing the rate of maternal education since the last year and is to what level it has reached till now in providing maternal education in the slum areas. They will also be asked to give feedback regarding the performance of the NGO till now (Flagg, 2013). An audit of the records of the program up until this year will be taken into consideration, in these records, the different cases along with the number of pregnant women and delivered children will reveal the implementation and succession of the program till now and can help to know the capabilities of the program (Grembowski, 2015). The material for the delivery of education will also be assessed to recognize the effectiveness of the program, and the respondents will be enquired that whether the material for the delivery of education is effective for or them to gain knowledge regarding maternal education (Dickson Saunders, 2014). In the meetings, the personnel of the program of evaluation will work as observers and will participate minimally for the accurate documenting of the necessary information obtained. The majority of the meetings are carried out utilizing the local language; therefore, the observers will be allowed to capture photos and will be conceded with an apparent command of the local language (Sutcuoglu et al., 2012). A clear explanation of the materials, activities, participants, essential information and methods utilized will be inclusively documented. The analysis of data will be conducted utilizing the Stata Version 8 with the objective of measuring the practicality of the answers that are provided with the help of the questionnaires. The responses or answers will be labeled 1 or and the final results will be provided in a table form for a convenient understanding (Schalock Thornton, 2013). Justification for the chosen methodology The methodology of this evaluation program is flexible and encompasses the contribution of the respondents who possess the high and low levels of literacy. This methodology includes attending the meetings by the personnel of the program of evaluation. This provides a foundation for the apparent surveillance of what the meetings involves and the efficiency of the procedures performed in the meetings (Dickson Saunders, 2014). The observers may manage to obtain the required photographs for constructing a comprehensible presentation of the evaluation statistics with the help of a PowerPoint presentation when required by the NGO in charge of the program. The recruitment of participants from the meeting is necessary, as they will present the exact type of information required due to their constant contribution throughout the set meetings (Brinkerhoff et al., 2012). From the participants, attainment for knowledgeable consent from the members is elementary for the success of the process of evaluation. This is for the reason that concerning the participants who are not willing to make available any information for the augmentation of appropriate results will lead to an exploitation of resources and attainment of the incorrect kind of information (Cousins et al., 2014). The process of sampling facilitates the personnel of the evaluation to move towards the accurate number of participants who assist in the process of evaluation as concerning the entire population might be considered extremely expensive on the part of the evaluation committee (Spaulding, 2014). The method used in the collection of is feasible for extracting information from the different types of respondents because those with low levels of literacy will be an interviewer who can help them in completing the questionnaires (Munoz, 2013). The questionnaires having a partial structure, accords the participants with the alternative of responding to the questions or providing their own answers (Dickson Saunders, 2014). Simultaneously, the participants can give more than one of the answers presented in the questionnaires to enhance the reliability of the provided information (Flagg, 2013). Providing the questionnaires in English as well as local language minimizes the need for understanding which necessitates an elevated number of interviewers. This work is headed for the lessening of expenses in the course of the process of evaluation (Grembowski, 2015). The method used for the analysis of data is efficient particularly in realizing precise outcomes. This will assist in obtaining the correct data which is necessary for making the accurate recommendations after the process of evaluation has been completed. The above aspects justify the practicality of the research methodology chosen for the process of evaluation (ÄÂ ±nar et al., 2016). While conducting this process of evaluation, it is essential to track a logical or universal approach where the ethical issues are considered. The ethical considerations are important to validate the research study and the results. It helps to verify the uniformity and reliability of the research study on the foundation of authentic records collected from the respondents. The data collected for this evaluation process will be exclusively utilized for evaluation purpose, and the confidentiality shall be maintained in every possible way (Oermann Gaberson, 2013). Two safeguards to maximize the credibility and reliability data collected The two most important limitations of the process of evaluation include the changeability of the information provided by means of the questionnaires along with the size of the sample. The inconsistency of information provided through the questionnaires is for the reason that the participants interpret diverse meaning in compliance to the information provided by means of the meetings (Whittaker et al., 2012). This affirms for the provision of an apparent, effectual as well as succinct safeguard that can work towards the intensification of inconsistency in the given answers. Consequently, the personnel of evaluation should make sure that they must be present at more meetings that will assist in recognizing where the inconsistency in the answers comes from (Sutcuoglu et al., 2012). The participants should be essentially subjected to a different survey that encompasses the similar questionnaires but this time, they will be recommended to provide responses that are based on the provided options. This will facilitate the team of evaluation to assess the similar types of answers relatively than relying on the unwritten answers that will be provided by the participants. With respect to the size of the sample, the evaluation team must also conduct an additional survey involving diverse participants to obtain different results (Cousins et al., 2014). References Boulmetis, J., Dutwin, P. (2014).The ABCs of evaluation: Timeless techniques for program and project managers(Vol. 56). Brinkerhoff, R. O., Brethower, D. M., Nowakowski, J., Hluchyj, T. (Eds.). (2012). ÄÂ ±nar, M., Timur, H., Aksoy, R. T., Gzel, A. ÄÂ °., Tokmak, A., Bedir FÄÂ ±ndÄÂ ±k, R., Uygur, D. (2016). Cousins, J. B., Goh, S. C., Elliott, C. J., Bourgeois, I. (2014). Dickson, R., Saunders, M. (2014). Developmental evaluation: Lessons for evaluative practice from the SEARCH Program.Evaluation,20(2), 176-194.